Yesterday, we submitted the Second Plaintiff's Brief.

 So far, it seems that the oral argument scheduled for 9/22 1500 will be held as planned.

 However.

 In today's hearing lottery for the Ikebukuro car runaway judgment trial, 22 people were elected.

 Due to the delta verrient epidemic in Tokyo, there may be restrictions on the number of listeners and, in some cases, postponement of oral arguments.

(I will let you know as soon as I understand)

 However, in order to keep a record in the court of how many people lined up in the hearing lottery,

 To make a silent appeal to judges that many people are paying attention to this trial.

 We kindly ask for your cooperation in the hearing lottery within a reasonable range.

 (Because it is difficult to distinguish between the asymptomatic Delta strain and the summer cold)

 ● If you have symptoms such as cough, runny nose, sputum, or fever, please take a rest in principle.

 ● High-performance masks such as KN94 and N95, double masks including inner filters, etc.

 Strictly take measures with a mask.

 ● Even if you have taken the vaccine twice, you can still be positive for corona. Please forgive those who are vaccine warriors.

The 3rd oral argument on 5/12 is over.

 Although it was in Tokyo where the state of emergency was still being declared, we were able to finish the lottery without any trouble.

 Thank you to everyone who gathered.

We submitted the plaintiff's first briefs, a statement of evidence, and Exhibits A38-52.

It was a counterargument to the defendant's preliminary allegation, "Reject and pay in advance."

 The articles were published by Tokyo Shimbun and Kanagawa Shimbun.

 It's also the season for personnel changes, and we were able to introduce the successor reporter to us.

 There are several.

 Next will be the Tokyo District Court 103 En Banc from 15:00 on 9/22.

 Based on the "noise damage" not mentioned in the first brief

 Our submission of the Second Brief will be the main topic of the next oral argument.

Even in the oral argument on 5/12, Judge Ms. Shimizu confirmed that the next step was "noise, isn't it?"

 While presenting the data of Hiroo Junior High School, which is a national noise measurement station, at the plaintiff's oral statement on 2/5

 We have already appealed the fact that the measured value is significantly higher than the value explained in advance to the residents.

 Making a brief based on this is the next "one of the our themes".

 We have a large number of materials that can be submitted as documentary evidence and entrust them to the defense team/our lawyers

 I have just finished a fairly heavy work by this month.

I haven't heard the specific meditation when to put it in the "arrangement of issues" yet.

I hear that the important document in the early stages is the complaint / plaintiff's first brief.

Documents that the successor will read firmly when the trial is prolonged and a change of judge occurs on the way,

In that sense, I realize that it is the critical point of the early game.

2/5 Thank you to everyone who cooperated in the hearing lottery.

The following yesterday's article was published in today's Tokyo Shimbun.

https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/84372

(1/29 description of change in lottery time)

Information was entered from the Tokyo District Court under the chief lawyer.

The second oral argument, scheduled for 1100 on 2/5 (Friday), is in the direction of implementation as of today.

The hearing lottery line will be created from 9:20 to 9:40 (Note: Updated based on information on 1/29)

It will be a lottery outdoors in front of the main entrance of the Tokyo District Court.

Tokyo District Court lottery announcement

https://www.courts.go.jp/app/botyokoufu_jp/detail?id=11654&list_id=15,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25

It is under the state of emergency.

We recommend that you line up in the lottery line with a double mask, etc., just in case.

At this time, the debriefing session will be held "online".

Details will be announced on the day of the event.

I would appreciate it if you could be wise about the situation.

The Defendant's Brief (1) has arrived. It is a long sentence of 70 pages.

Defendant's court strategy seems to aim for "first" prepaid.

In other words, regarding administrative acts related to Haneda new route setting

Because it is "non-disposable" and all 29 plaintiffs are not "plaintiff qualified"

The court argues that administrative acts should not be judged legal or illegal.

● "Not disposable"

The logic of the state's claim is that "the addressee is not a resident", "it has no direct effect on the legal status or rights and obligations", and "it is an internal sentence of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (complaint first)". That's right.

● "Not eligible for plaintiff"

The state's allegations apparently all plaintiffs said, "The disposition inevitably infringes on our rights or the interests protected by law.

There is no fear. "

I had the impression that the issue was cleared as soon as the payment was made in advance (rejection).

As soon as it was rejected, the state's claim was

● There is no reason for the plaintiff's proceedings

I want to argue. I also want to say "Omaegana!" (Laughs)

As soon as we are ready, we would like to submit our (first) briefs and additional evidence and wait for the judge to judge.

t.b.d

T.B.D.