【defendant】

Defendant June 7 Brief (6)

Submission of Exhibit Otsu 25 (Regarding the number of "measures such as restraint" that occurred from January to March 2016 in Ushiku Immigration Bureau)

[Next date]

July 20, 2021 11: 30-Preparation procedure for speech by web conference

The other party's briefs will be submitted by July 9th.

2021/4/19 13:15 ~ Web conference preparatory procedure for speech (15th)

【plaintiff】

10th Preparatory Document, 11th Preparatory Document, Exhibits A48 to Exhibit A53, Proposal of Evidence

The court is considering hiring two doctors who have applied for witnesses from the plaintiff this time.

[Next date]

June 11, 2021 (Friday) 11: 30-

Defendant refutes the plaintiff's document this time (the deadline for submitting the document is June 7)

Both sides confirm the dates when doctors will come to the Mito District Court for cross-examination.

2021/02/26 11: 15- Web conference format speech preparation procedure

【us】

・ Plaintiff's 9th brief, Exhibit Ko 47 (bereaved family email)

【Country】

・ National Brief 5, Exhibit Otsu 22-24

[Preparation until next time]

(We) Counterargument to the national briefs + application for personal identification (Dr. Hara, Dr. Higashiya) → Until the end of March.

[Next date]

April 19, 13:15 Web speech preparation procedure Plaintiffs at Milestone General Law Office

November 20, 2020 11: 30- Mito District Court No. 301 Court

【plaintiff】
・ Plaintiff submits the 8th brief dated October 29 ・ Exhibits A45 and 46
【defendant】
・ Otsu 20, 21

[Next date]

February 26, 2021 11:15 am Oral No. 301 Court

[Preparations]

・ Submit the defendant's briefs by February 19 ・ The plaintiff will consider whether to re-argue against the defendant's next briefs by the next deadline. Consider by

September 18, 2020 11:00 pm Mito District Court No. 301 Court

Oral argument date

The presiding judge and the right seat were replaced.

【defendant】

・ Preparation document dated July 3, 2020 4

・ Exhibit Otsu 20 (report of the government hearing opinions from doctors) Exhibit Otsu 21 (medical book)

【plaintiff】

・ The complaint against Mr. Kawamura, who was the director of Ushiku at the time of the incident, was withdrawn on April 7, 2020.

【next time】

The plaintiff argues against the country's allegations.

[Next date]

 November 20, 2020 11: 30- Mito District Court　No. 301 Court

2020年6月5日に予定されていた口頭弁論期日は新型コロナウイルスの影響で、裁判所から期日取消の連絡があり、延期となりました。

次回決まりましたら、またお知らせします。

200306 16:00-Mito District Court No. 302, Oral Argument (11th in total)

【plaintiff】

・ Preparation document 7 (supplementation based on doctor's opinion. Responding to previous court's explanation)

・ Ko 43 (doctor's additional opinion) and Ko 44 ("What is Consciousness Disorder?"

[Defendant country]

・ Otsu 19 Literature on Cameroon's national compensation system

【court】

・ Next time, the government will refute plaintiffs' fifth to seventh preliminary documents.

-You can understand that you can submit national compensation to foreigners in Cameroon by submitting the second party. Is it OK that the state does not assert mutual assurance (Article 6 of the National Liability Law)?

→ The state does not assert itself.

-Based on this, the plaintiffs said that they would consider whether to keep the defendant Kawamura's individual appeal.

[Next date]

June 5, 16:15-Mito District Court No. 302, Oral Argument (12th in total)

・ Counter objection by defendant country

・ Plaintiff considers whether to withdraw Kawamura's personal complaint

200117 @ 11:30-Mito District Court No. 302, oral argument date (10th in total)

【plaintiff】

6th Preparatory Document Submission

Kou 42 (doctor's opinion) submission

[From the court]

・ From the contents of the written opinion, it is understandable that it should have been transported at 19:04 for lifesaving, and that it was not known at 20:30 that it was saved.

・ Based on that, at the stage of 19:04, I would like to clarify the condition of the person and what measures were taken to save the life

-Conversely, at the stage of 20:30, I want you to clarify how the inmates' condition deteriorated and why it was difficult to save their lives

And the plaintiff will respond to this by the next time.

Next date

March 6, 2020 @ 16:00 ~ Mito District Court No. 302

2019/11/15 11: 30〜 Court of Mito District Court 301

【plaintiff】

・ Submission of the fifth preparation document-causal relations, supplementary claims about cause of death

[Defendants]

None.

Due to the mutual guarantee principle, there is still no response to Cameroon's national law.

[Next schedule]

January 17, 2020 11:30-Mito District Court 301

By January 10th, the plaintiff will submit a doctor's opinion on the cause of death and causality and a written preparation based on it.

・ Preparation of country preparation document (3), submitted to B-14-18

There was an answer to the previous explanation from us.

It was very amazing.

It was not the immigration staff but the guard man who was entrusted that the video that the man suffered from moaning was confirmed. Although it is possible to listen to the audio, it seems that he was not listening to it (the country representative said he was not sure if it could be investigated).

In addition, the rest, movement, and custody diary that is open to the public states that there are no abnormalities in the situation of men on the day, but this diary was created by a guardman, not an immigration officer. I understood that.

・ It was August 16 that preparation documents were submitted by the government. We held a quick defense council meeting and filed a petition for petition 2

・ The next time, we decided to compile allegations of violations of relief duties by immigration staff based on the facts revealed by us.

-Next date November 15th 11:30-Mito District Court No. 302 Court Next time will be a public court again.